That's unlikely to succeed: The former Secretary of Defense cautions that Vladimir Putin is counting on Donald Trump's reelection.
Former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper criticized former
President Donald Trump and other Republicans in Washington on Sunday, urging
increased support for Ukraine in its ongoing conflict with Russia.
During an interview with CBS' Margaret Brennan, Esper, who
had served in Trump's initial administration, commented on what Americans
should anticipate if Trump secured a second term in office. Esper remarked,
"I believe he would likely follow through on his stated intentions. He
might attempt to broker a deal between Russia and Ukraine, which is unlikely to
succeed. The key to resolving the Ukraine conflict lies with Vladimir Putin,
and it's improbable he'll take such action anytime soon."
He continued, "Therefore, I anticipate that Trump would
swiftly cut off financial aid to Ukraine and possibly consider reducing support
for NATO or even withdrawing from the alliance, which would have severe
repercussions for United States national security."
Trump, who is currently the leading 2024 Republican
candidate, has frequently questioned the level of support provided to Ukraine
by the United States. He has also claimed that he could end the conflict within
24 hours if reelected.
Esper also expressed concern on Sunday that Putin might be
waiting for a Trump return to the presidency.
However, Esper's criticism wasn't limited to Trump. When
asked about Senator Tommy Tuberville's months-long hold on hundreds of military
nominees, Esper stated that it was unjust to hold these nominees hostage over a
policy matter unrelated to their responsibilities.
Senator Tuberville had blocked promotions for more than 300
senior Pentagon officers requiring Senate confirmation in protest against a
Department of Defense policy related to paid leave and other expenses for
service members seeking abortions, which he deemed a violation of federal law.
Esper warned that such actions and political gridlock in
Washington could send a chaotic message to the world, contrasting it with the
efficient functioning of the Chinese government, which maintains readiness and
does not engage in similar legislative delays. Esper emphasized that such
dysfunction harms American readiness and the nation's standing on the
international stage.

Comments
Post a Comment