Tinubu's Legal Team Expresses Discontent as Court Mandates Disclosure of Chicago Academic Records
The United States District Court in the Northern District of Illinois has
issued a ruling in favor of Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the
Peoples Democratic Party. They have ordered Chicago State University to release
President Bola Tinubu's academic records by today (Monday).
However, Tinubu's legal team is adamant that these documents
are irrelevant to Atiku's appeal against Tinubu in the Supreme Court. The PUNCH
reported that Atiku had previously obtained an order from a US magistrate compelling
CSU to provide Tinubu's academic records to his legal team within two days.
These records include Tinubu's admission and acceptance records at Chicago
State University, attendance dates, as well as degrees, awards, and honors
received from CSU.
As the magistrate's deadline approached, Tinubu's lawyers
approached the US high court, arguing that the magistrate's decision needed to
be reviewed by a district judge. The request for a review and a delay of the
magistrate's order until Monday was granted by the US district judge.
Tinubu's application, submitted by his New York-based
lawyer, Oluwole Afolabi, cited two reasons for objection. First, it argued that
the academic records in question are not useful in Nigerian courts, as Nigerian
election proceedings and courts have historically not been receptive to such
discovery. Second, it claimed that Atiku's request is overly intrusive as it
allows for an unwarranted examination of Tinubu's private, confidential, and
protected educational records.
In response, Atiku filed a fresh response in Chicago,
Illinois, urging the court to reject Tinubu's request entirely. In a new
judgment obtained by The PUNCH on Sunday, the court noted that CSU did not
object to Judge Jeffrey Gilbert's decision to make the academic records public.
The court held that Atiku's interest outweighed any
intrusion on Tinubu's privacy concerning his educational records. The judge
overruled Tinubu's objections to the magistrate's ruling, and as a result,
granted Atiku's application. To meet the impending Supreme Court of Nigeria
deadline of October 5, 2023, the court set an expedited schedule for the
completion of discovery, directing CSU to produce relevant, non-privileged
documents and a corporate designee for deposition.
However, the judge emphasized that his verdict does not
express any view on the merits of Atiku's claims against President Tinubu, his
graduation from CSU, or the validity of the Nigerian election. It solely
acknowledges Atiku's entitlement to the documents and testimony he requested
from CSU.
In response to the verdict, a member of the PDP National
Executive Council, National Deputy Youth Leader, Timothy Osadolor, described
President Tinubu's appeal as unnecessary and suggested that the US judgment
would bolster Atiku's case before the Supreme Court.
Efforts to reach the spokesman for the All Progressives
Congress, Felix Morka, were unsuccessful. Meanwhile, one of President Tinubu's
attorneys, Oluwole Afolabi, downplayed the significance of his academic
documents, stating that they would be of no use in Atiku's Supreme Court appeal
in Nigeria. Afolabi argued that the Electoral Act does not allow for the
introduction of new evidence on appeal and emphasized that Tinubu's attendance
and grades at Chicago State University had already been provided.
Similarly, the Coordinator of the Tinubu Presidential Legal
Team, Babatunde Ogala (SAN), stated that the documents were no longer usable
and of no value, clarifying that it was established that President Tinubu
attended Chicago State University and that his grades had been disclosed.

Comments
Post a Comment